Just based on the specifications (4x A73 + 2x A53 against 2x A72 + 4x A53), the Amlogic should be faster, but to find out just how much we’ve run some benchmarks. It’s a little early to test AI acceleration on A311D however, as the SDK will only be ready at the end of August.
PCMARK 10 UNINSTALL TV
No, but RK3399Pro model has a 3.0 TOPS NPUĭolby Vision, HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, and PRIME HDRĬontrary to Amlogic A311D/S922X-B, Rockchip RK3399 is not a TV box SoC, so the Amlogic processor will have better multi-media functions such as HDR (High-Dynamic Range) support, and overall better audio support & video playback compared to the Rockchip processor.Īmlogic A311D also comes with a 5.0 TOPS NPU (Neural-network Processing Unit), while RK3399 does not have one, but Rockchip does have an alternative with Rockchip RK3399Pro equipped with a 3.0 TOPS NPU. Amlogic A311D vs Rockchip RK3399 – Key features The results for A311D should be the same as for Amlogic S922X-B processor, so this post could also serve as an Amlogic S922X-B vs RK3399 comparison.
PCMARK 10 UNINSTALL ANDROID
To do so, I’ve compared Antutu 7.x, PCMark 10 Work 2.0, and 3Dmark benchmark results in Khadas VIM3 board running Android 9, against an actively-cooled Rockchip RK3399 SBC running Android 8.1. But let’s see how it compares to another hexa-core processor, namely the popular Rockchip RK3399 Cortex-A72/A53 processor released in 2016 and found in several Chromebooks, TV boxes, and development boards. The board is powered by the latest Amlogic A311D hexa-core Cortex-A73/A53 processor, and I’ve found results to be impressive. I’ve run some benchmarks on Khadas VIM3 SBC earlier this morning.
0 kommentar(er)
